MRTA (Cannabis Law), Article 6, Sections 131–139
Article 6 governs how cannabis law interacts with local governments, courts, and state agencies.
These sections determine where cannabis businesses may operate, how municipalities participate, how legal challenges work, and what happens when part of the law is invalidated. Operators encounter these rules during site selection, municipal disputes, enforcement actions, and appeals.
Municipalities may opt out of allowing:
If a municipality opts out, those license types cannot operate there.
Municipalities may not opt out of:
These activities are controlled exclusively by the State.
Even where retail is allowed, municipalities retain authority over:
Before committing to a location, operators must confirm:
Failure to verify this has caused operators to lose leases, deposits, and buildout costs.
If a legal action involves cannabis licensing, enforcement, or regulation, the Office of Cannabis Management must be named as a party.
If OCM is not included:
For operators, this means:
This is a legal requirement, not a litigation strategy.
Applicants and licensees may seek judicial review of OCM or Cannabis Control Board decisions.
Courts do not:
Courts review only:
The record includes:
Weak or incomplete records cannot be repaired on appeal.
If a court invalidates one provision of Article 6, the remaining sections remain enforceable.
For operators, this means:
Only legislative or regulatory changes alter ongoing requirements.